User talk:81.145.241.145

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to 2007 Cricket World Cup

Your recent edit to 2007 Cricket World Cup (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Generally uncool behavior

Hi there. It appears you are engaging in disruptive behavior on Wikipedia, and I wished to point out to you the essay WP:NOTCOOL. You may wish to have a read of it. Yuser31415 18:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to 2007 Cricket World Cup, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. GizzaChat © 22:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Comment removals

Is there an particular reason for this series of edits? -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 19:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Banbury, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Noface1 15:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I have not done anything wrong I know this IP address is shared by lots of users but I cant make my own account because it wont let me what should I do?"

Decline reason: "Follow the instructions. — Yamla 03:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

There is no block on this IP. IrishGuy talk 22:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Steven Pienaar, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Moonriddengirl 17:32, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Draco Malfoy, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

[edit] October 2007

Refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Characters of Titanic (1997). Your edits to Characters of Titanic (1997) constitute vandalism and have reverted. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Flyer22 17:45, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Adverb, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 17:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to 1923 Great Kantō earthquake has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 17:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:James I of England has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 19:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)