User talk:81.133.178.161

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop targeting one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 14:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

why get yourself involved in something that has nothing to do with you or indeed that you arent interested in then i dont come on to this site and start complaining about this that and the next thing like a busy body with nothing better to do with their time maybe you should let other get on with what they are doing and if it is not directly involving you then stay well clear

Im sure wikipedia is big enough and strong enough to survive and or take care of itself without interference from someone with no interest in football or should i say soccer. thank you.

And I'm sure if The Gallowgate article was big and strong enough to survive on the Wikipedia it wouldn't need you vandalizing my user page. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 16:02, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

i dont see why you felt the need to complain i mean you seem young enough not to be an old moaning face robert di nero type focker character now,ok i accept having a wee dig at you was a bit silly but it wasnt meant to offend as i actually am an avid fan of star trek and have been since a kid in the sixties and as for warcraft im not a big fan but i can see the appeal as i used to enjoy playing everquest. So lets call it quits then

And I don't see the need to vandalize. I'm trying to have a civil discussion as to why the article does not meet inclusion criteria for the Wikipedia. I also don't see why I'm the only target of the vandalism. I didn't just vote delete, I said delete it unless it was rewritten. If the article can be rewritten to meet the inclusion criteria of WP:WEB then I will gladly change my vote. These guidelines are in place to prevent Wikipedia from becoming a mess. These guidelines are the reason why Wikipedia is such a useful source of information. Instead of calling it quits so to say, I say use your editing ability to improve the article and make it worthy of inclusion. Vandalism will only result in a waste of time and effort by both parties. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 17:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)