User talk:80.237.187.34

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Snap fastener

Thank you for your improvement to the article. Nicely done. DurovaCharge! 18:15, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Three Revert Rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pro-ana. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Cyrius|✎ 16:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Hello there

I noticed your edits on Bulimia nervosa and have to thank you for the contribution. It really does help with the cleanup of it. I see you've had some trouble getting some edits through on the pro-ana article. Generally users respond better if you have an account. I think it's because people can get very protective about articles they work on and don't like rapid and sudden change. This especially applies to anon users unfortunately. My advice to you would be to get an account as there are a large number of editors who for some reason do not look favourably on anon users. It's clear that your edits are not vandalism and you deserve to have a voice hear and it is unfortunate that people who are new are treated as such. Anyway whatever you decide happy editing.:) Medos (talk • contribs) 11:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wannarexia

I have largely reverted your changes to Wannarexia that were based on the incorrect assumption that a reference with a dead link should be removed. The printed reference is still valid, so the proper thing to do in this case is to simply comment out the dead link. I restored some of the improvements you made. If you wish to furtrher improve the article, please do it in a stepwise manner so it is possible to furtrher improve it without having to revert a massive edit. Dhaluza (talk) 09:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)