User talk:80.233.255.7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] GNU/Linux redirect

Hi. You wrote this in an edit summary:

your change on GNU/Linux was reverted by another user, use the talk page for controversial changes and don't revert war against consensus

I would like to point out that it was one revert on my side and two on yours. Your tone suggests a sense of superiority, which I find offensive. Furthermore, "majority" does not constitute "consensus". When an editor disagrees, clearly no consensus has been reached. 80.233.255.7 00:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey. If you read the talk pages, you can see that there is a disagreement of what the page should contain. But no-one has ever suggested redirecting to GNU. Therefore, such a move is highly controversial. There was nothing wrong with your change, originally, of course. Being bold is good and suggestions are always welcome. But when an editor, or in this case two, revert your changes, it's not a good idea to revert back but to take the conversation to the talk page. Thanks, Prolog 00:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
You did not say that in your edit summary, which said "rv - this redirects to where GNU/Linux redirects". Thanks for explaining that now, though. 80.233.255.7 14:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during January 13, 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism to User talk:Mike92591 will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. John254 04:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] create an account

Please create an account. Talking with IP numbers if not very nice. --MarSch 15:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Linux kernel edit

Hi. Sorry that I didn't include any message in the edit summary, its usually something that I try to avoid. Discussion started at Talk:Linux kernel#Linux supports such and such architectures. I would also encourage you to create an account. Cheers. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 21:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tivoization

I'm not sure adding "...is a term that describes..." adds anything. Every entry could be described as "...a term that describes...". Aside from a technical distinction along the lines of The Treachery Of Images, it seems to say the same thing. -- Seitz 05:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please create an account

Hi, thanks for participating in the discussion on Talk:Linux, but could you create an account? There are now a lot of IP addresses appearing in the discussions on that page and it's hard to have discussions with voices when people can't tell which comments are from the same person or two or ten people. You can use an pseudonym for your username, so you're privacy will not be reduced - indeed, it will be increased because you're IP address will no longer be displayed. (BTW, I'm putting this notice on the Talk page of each IP address that joins the discussion, it's not just you.) Thanks. Gronky 14:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] http://spam.noooxml.org

Noooxml

Accounts

Pieterh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)
84.64.233.164 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
Kaern (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)
72.40.2.171 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
190.48.122.75 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
Adi86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)
80.233.255.7 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Hu12 15:49, 3 September 2007 (UTC)