User talk:80.216.145.96

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by Verdict.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.
CheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address (or network) has been used abusively.
This address (or network) has been blocked temporarily or permanently to prevent further abuse.

In extreme cases, an entire network may be blocked to prevent an abusive user from continually changing their IP address in order to evade blocks or abusing multiple accounts. If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please follow these instructions.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed.

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

{

  • Blocking admin: [[User:
{]] ([[User_talk:
  • Decline reason:

You're not autoblocked MaxSem 07:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Vem som än fick den här addressen blockerad spelar ingen roll för det var inte jag som skriver nu. Whoever got this address block those not matter beacuse it wasn´t me who´s writting now."


Decline reason: "The block in question is a checkuser block -- those aren't overturned lightly. It's apparent that this address is or has been a source of persistent abuse. While I regret any collateral damage this may be causing, Dmcdevit's checkuser investigation has determined that the block is called for. You can contact unblock-en-l or Dmcdevit directly if you have any further questions. – Luna Santin (talk) 02:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Nobody has done any edit with this address and no rule on this website has been broken via this ip. I am sure of that. This is probably just a missunderstanding so please any admin unblock for now."


Decline reason: "Hello and good bye, Verdict. --  Netsnipe  ►  17:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Edits to Brock Lesnar

Your edits aren't constructive, You're removing a lot of information and rewording other information into a non-encyclopedic way. Since so many people want to protect that article for some reason, it's best you just introduce edits one at a time, changing once piece at a time and see if it gets reverted. That's the best thing to do. Wikidudeman (talk) 07:55, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

This is the only warningyou will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalizeWikipedia again, as you did to Brock Lesnar, you will be blockedfrom editing. Wikidudeman(talk)08:37, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Blocked