Talk:76th Academy Awards

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
List
This article has been rated as List-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

Shouldn't we also have the nominees on this page? They were all there before and simply being a nominee is also considered to be an honor. --mav 11:02, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

There is a separate page for that. Link is near the end of the page. --Cantus

[edit] Trademark

All these trademark symbols and disclaimers are unnecessary and ugly. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academy Awards for more discussion. --ESP 21:40, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Image

The image for the official poster isn't showing up--anybody know why? Also, anybody think we should use the poster of the Best Picture instead, to sort of date the year at a glance? jengod 02:05, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC)



Somebody should figure out what the following paragraph from the article actually means, and fix it.

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King swept all 11 categories in which it was nominated. It matched the record 11 wins of Titanic and Ben-Hur and became only the third movie to sweep every nominated category, following Gigi and The Last Emperor, which both went nine-for-nine.

According to the table lower in the article, Monster also won every nominated category this year. Should it only include movies with more than one nomination? More than 5 nominations? Cwitty 22:19, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)


On my IE for PC, there's a funny little space between the bottom of the poster and the border around it. Any ideas? jengod 00:35, Mar 6, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Oscars2003.JPG

Image:Oscars2003.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)