User talk:76.90.172.217

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] March 2008

Anonymous Users (IP addresses):

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Paul Tuminaro has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 02:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Tuminaro. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Paul Tuminaro was changed by 76.90.172.217 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-22T06:25:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Evil saltine (talk) 06:35, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. IrishGuy talk 03:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. IrishGuy talk 23:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Greg Glienna. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BpEps - t@lk 09:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Three-revert rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Greg Glienna. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Stifle (talk) 09:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Greg Glienna, you will be blocked from editing. BpEps - t@lk 09:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.