User talk:76.76.13.95

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 76.76.13.95, is registered to Carolina Internet. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Carolina Internet to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Carolina Internet, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mwai Kibaki. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Contents

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mwai Kibaki, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mwai Kibaki was changed by 76.76.13.95 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-12-31T03:32:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Our Lady of Perpetual Succour. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

[edit] Blocked

You are blocked for a week for multiple article vandalisms. Please don't do that again. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Talk:War of 1812. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please give some kind of reasoning when reverting edits. Narson (talk) 22:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:War of 1812, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Removing directions for other users is most unhelpful. Narson (talk) 10:19, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Harper Lee, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Harper Lee was changed by 76.76.13.95 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-25T15:11:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Face. --Dr.K. (talk) 15:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Your recent edit to United States v. O'Brien (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:09, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Texas v. Johnson. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Texas v. Johnson was changed by 76.76.13.95 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-28T18:11:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Texas v. Johnson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Prashanthns (talk) 18:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Brandenburg v. Ohio. Thingg⊕⊗ 18:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 2 weeks from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Trusilver 18:24, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "niggerniggernigger"

Decline reason: "No, you need to specify a reason. Continued abuse will lead to your block being extended and this page being protected Gwernol 19:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.