User talk:76.248.229.104

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First of all you are using dynamic IP generation to appear and disappear under various anonymous guises, and this aspect of your involvement in Wikipedia is questionable. If you want to take part seriously, create a userid and establish a record of constructive work. The image you have cited is a doodle, nothing more. Seeing diabolic imagery in the pencil drawing is entirely in your interpretation. FWIW, the real issue here is your use of pointed and indiscriminate name-calling and baiting. Bzuk (talk) 02:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC).

And thank you very much! I don't own ATT or Yahoo, I don't chose my IP number. It has nothing to do with me. Why is that such a problem to Internet people? My identity is really none of your concern. I am not profane, I post interesting and truthful topics, and any questionable aspects of my internet use is on the part of others. I do nothing questionable at all, thank you. And the image in question is not just a doodle, thank you for your input, Mr. Capra. Though your true identity is none of my business. And, again, I have not mentioned the Christian Bible at all in this discussion, I only mention the use of 666 in Hollywood films. I realize you are a very intelligent Wiki admin, but please to misinterpret my posts. And you can delete me on your talk page all you want to, but I won't delete you here. See the difference between Canadians and Americans?--76.248.229.104 (talk) 03:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

If editors wish to introduce a possibly contentious edit to a Wikipedia article, it is contingent on the original submitter to provide a clear and unequivocal attribution that supports the initial contention. That requirement is the basis of Wikipedia's prime directive of providing authoritative, encyclopedic reference material. The usual recourse is to initiate a query for commentary on the aforementioned article's discussion page. I invite you to make that effort, regardless of the outcome. As I had already attempted to clarify my concerns, it was not over the claim which I still characterize as dubious but over the lack of proportion that was evident in the reaction to editors' challenges to the contention of satanic images present in the film. FWIW, the use of inappropriate comments are routinely archived not deleted. You will see the items still in place, but my archiving of them indicates that they have been read and acknowledged. Being Canadian, German or Italian has no bearing on this topic. Bzuk (talk) 03:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC).
The reason for establishing an identity and that does not require any disclosure of your actual name, is to provide other editors with a framework of how to communicate and collaboratively work together. An example of the liability in relying strictly on IP or "guest" accounts is that one of the usual protection devices employed in assisting the development of articles is to restrict participation to only established users, thereby any anonymous IP users will be excluded from editing the protected article. FWIW Bzuk (talk) 03:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC).
Yes, thank you very much. I understand that one's nationality has no bearing in this issue, irregardless of BillCJ's volunteering to find a Canadian pro-"McCartyhians" who are WW II veterans. We must all work together to overcome our differences. But I'll take your advice and post a query on the movie's Discussion page. Thank you again.