User talk:76.212.154.129

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My studies and the way history is researched in the real world have no bearing on the rules of Wikipedia. You (presuming you are the same person who had continuously added this particular bit) have been asked repeatedly to provide a source for your edits, as required by verifiability, yet you have not. This is especially important because you are discussing a living person, which is a particularly sensitive topic for Wikipedia (see Seigenthaler controversy and our biographies of living persons policy. Natalie 03:39, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Why, that's easily answered. The poster says that he has at least one email from Gieringer stating that a centralized database would never be created. And the poster cited the Ukiah newspaper, the reporter named Meadows, and the area420 website that put the Craven episode on the Web. There's hard facts, I would believe this poster. Historically speaking, that's the way it works until hard evidence is razed in dust and rubble. Thankfully, this poster was thoughtful enough to show us what he had discovered. That website is no longer there, but the newspaper is, and High Times even had an interview with Craven. What a nice person that poster must be to bring all this to our attention! And that poster is also a living person, let us not interfere too much with his life by deleting him everywhere, as that must be some kind of bio interruption. What a nice person!--76.212.158.95 (talk) 01:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)