User talk:76.212.147.119

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've finally managed to get a response from you! If you check the talk pages of the various IPs you've used, you'll find that I've left many, many messages for you regarding your edits. I have also communicated this information through the edit summaries at Aryan Brotherhood. I can only assume from your response that you have not received any of these messages.
As to what Wikipedia is a source of, it makes no claims to represent the truth. Wikipedia only claims to attempt to represent that which is verifiable, and in this case, you've provided no way to verify the information you present. The David Lind entry you referenced is not a reliable source, as it itself provides no external sources. A general discussion of what a reliable source is can be found at Wikipedia: Reliable sources.
The probable libel is this edit and the half dozen identical edits you've attempted to make, suggesting that this person used their friendship with a governor to get into the witness protection program. As the governor in question is still living, this edit runs afoul of Wikipedia: Biographies of living persons. And considering that the information at Wonderland Gang is almost identical in phrasing to the piece you have attempted to add to Aryan Brotherhood, I would not be surprised if I found your IP in the edit history, adding this particular paragraph. No, you cannot legitimize your edits to one article by making identical edits to another article. Natalie 21:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)