User talk:76.182.220.150

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello 76.182.220.150! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Signature icon.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Garry Denke 14:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
-
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

[edit] Regarding edits to Scroll Trench

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 76.182.220.150! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bfreewebs\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 23:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! 76.182.220.150 17:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spam

Please don't spam talk pages with original research. Dragons flight 06:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! 76.182.220.150 17:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits to Garry Denke

Please don't copy and paste another user's userpage onto this person's user page. It appears to be vandalism and has been reverted. Benea 13:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! 76.182.220.150 17:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:76.182.220.150. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Danelo 14:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! 76.182.220.150 17:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Promotions

Please stop adding links to myself and Dragons flight on your page and Garry Denke's, which you are describing as promotions. Benea 16:34, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! 76.182.220.150 17:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heelstone

Benea, please stop changing the Devonian Senni bed Old Red Sandstone formation Altar Stone in the Stonehenge article to "Silurian"-Devonian, the Altar Stone (no. 80) and the Heelstone (no. 96) at Stonehenge are not Silurian. Thank you! 76.182.220.150 17:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Wow you kids (Dragons flight, Benea, et al) have been having a lot of fun. You are quite right 76.182.220.150, the Altar Stone (no. 80) at the center of Stonehenge is not Silurian, it is a Devonian Period sedimentary Old Red Sandstone from the Cosheston micaceous Senni Bed Formation of South Wales according to English Heritage [1] and the British Geological Survey [2]. The wiki Stonehenge article currently stands in error, sadly Adamsan Adamsan is not around to correct Benea's mistakes anymore. O well... Garry Denke 22:15, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Please provide a reference then. Benea 22:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Three references above. Please provide your references. Regretfully Adamsan Adamsan is not here to stop to your vandalizing behavior. Please stop vandalizing the Stonehenge article Adamsan Adamsan developed. The Heelstone (no. 96) and the Altar Stone (no. 80) are not "Silurian". Please, you and/or your vandalizing buddy, Dragons flight, provide your two (2) recent references otherwise, or correct your mistakes. Thank you! 76.182.220.150 05:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't really care if it was or wasn't Silurian. However you and your father (User: Garry Denke) have been identified as hoaxers, and been caught attempting to add erroneous material to this and a number of articles to push your own theories in violation of WP:NOR. If you (or anyone one else can prove it wasn't Silurian, then the information can go in the article with my blessings. If not then it has no place in this encyclopedia. You need references to add material, not to remove it. Unreferenced material may be challenged and removed at anytime. --Benea 11:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Pappy removed "Silurian", Benea added "Silurian": Therefore; demand for Benea reference is hereby made again. 76.182.220.150 16:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
This isn't really an issue of adding/removing material, it is a disagreement over a matter of fact. Given that User:Garry Denke has a history of making claims about Stonehenge that are considerably outside the mainstream academic consensus, I am not inclined to take his word over this. I've removed two controversial adjectives to leave something that everyone can agree on, pending the provision of sources. --Cherry blossom tree 17:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Neither of the links you give support your assertions. If you can provide sources that do then you are welcome to do so. --Cherry blossom tree 14:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
You have an unusual method of using talk pages. Please add your comment after the person you are replying to rather than inserting it into someone else's comment, while also removing another part of that comment. I'll repeat myself, however. You are possibly right, but you need references. Claiming that various organisations support your position does you no good unless you can point out where they support you. Otherwise anyone could simply claim that God agrees with them and he outranks the British Geological Survey. --Cherry blossom tree 08:13, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Tutu? OMG, John's hilarious! Altar Stone's Devonian. Garry Denke 19:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
The source you quote is uncertain on the origin of the Altar Stone: "...[the] degree of deformation may indicate that they are older than the Devonian. As their origin remains unknown it is still not possible to provenance them." Cherry blossom tree 08:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
And rightly so, she's not that smart. Garry Denke 15:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)