User talk:76.18.140.105

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi there, and thank you for your vandalism revision to the Iran Holocaust article. It is deeply appreciated, since it has been targeted repeatedly, today. I have reverted several times, but it isd hard to keep up.

Have you considered registering here? you seem a good contributer. Jeffpw 18:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Please put your reasons for the Pinochet tag on the talk page, SqueakBox 22:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Pigs Is Pigs (1937 film)

Yesterday, you taged this article for being in need of cleanup. You didn't post anything on the discussion page about it. You wrote:This article needs serious rennovation. Why? What's the problem? This article has been online for 2 1/2 years nows and undergone extensive rennovation and improovement over the time. What do you find wrong with it? -- Jason Palpatine 21:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC) Image:confused-tpvgames.gif This User fails to understand Wikipedia's Systematized Logistical Projection of its Balanced Policy Contingency. (speak your mind | contributions)

You have again taged the article. This time you cite lack of notability as the reason. WHY? I'm sure there are many not very notable articles on Wikpiedia -- some of them realating to other WB cartoons. Why are you doing this? This is an encyclopedia. What people wanht to reference is not for you to decide. What's not notable to one person is notable to another. What's your problem? --Jason Palpatine (talk) 01:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Minoru Tanaka

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Minoru Tanaka, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. --Tbeatty 05:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the La Shawn Barber page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Oliver202 15:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to V for Vendetta. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- lucasbfr talk 22:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Creep (film). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Locations in the Warcraft Universe (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 04:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Please, you will be blocked from editing. bikeable (talk) 04:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)