User talk:75.51.184.223

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Prosper (web site)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

[edit] Your Edits on Prosper (web site)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Hu12 19:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

RESPONSE -- Actually, I believe it is YOU who is engaged in an edit war. You have repeatedly removed huge portions of the Prosper article page, without (IMHO) justification. I see from looking at the history that you have a long-standing history of deleting external links on that page and others. By my reading of WP:EL (and the reading of others as explained in the history), the Prosper page external links are appropriate. The links to the third-party statistics sites in particular are analogous to links to statistics of professional athletes, which WP:EL uses as an example of links that SHOULD be included. Moreover, according to the revert page, it is YOUR wholesale deletion of appropriate material that is inappropriate, because you should be trying to "improve" other people's edits, not simply delete them. Further, according to the text of your own message above, YOU are supposed to "not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors." I posted to the talk page of the Prosper article and your talk page, yet you responded to neither, choosing instead to simply again delete everything in the Prosper article you do not agree with. I do not believe that is proper behavior on Wikipedia. 75.51.184.223 20:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 19:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You have been blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Prosper (web site). Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Maxim 20:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I believe that it is Hu12, not I, that has violated the three-revert rule. I believe that Hu12 is repeatedly and improperly deleting huge portions of the Prosper article for no good reason. I have attempted to engage in dialog with Hu12, by posting my points on my talk page, Hu12's talk page, AND the discussion page of the Prosper article, all to no avail. Hu12 simply keeps reverting my reversion of his deletion of the material (some of which I added, but most of which was added by others). Please fix this situation. Thank you."

Decline reason: "Decline; you have clearly violated the three revert rule. Please avoid edit warring in the future. — Haemo 00:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Hu12 (talk) 08:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Response: Once again, it is YOU who is engaged in vandalism of the Prosper page. You remove a significant portion of the entire article, consisting of useful content that is wholly proper. Further, you refuse to engage in any discussion of the issue with me, despite my leaving comments on your talk page, on my talk page, AND in the discussion page of the Prosper Article. I find your actions to be wholly inappropriate, and I see from the discussion on your talk page that other users agree with respect to similar actions you have taken on other articles. Stop abusing your power, and stop violating the Wikipedia rules.75.51.184.223 (talk) 02:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)