User talk:75.31.251.168

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The column of numbers from Martin Gilberts book is ONLY for Jewsish Holocaust victims. That is why it is correct to have that title. The source tells us that the 5.7 million were only Jews.--Woogie10w (talk) 02:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

There IS NO SUCH EVENT AS "THE JEWISH HOLOCAUST". IT'S "THE HOLOCAUST". Hence, saying "Jewish Holocaust" is inappropriate. I recognize that the figures pertain solely to Jewish deaths, but it is worded inappropriately, as though Jews were the only victims. Find a different way to word this.--75.31.251.168 (talk) 02:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notes

Read the Notes the Non Jewsish Victims of the nazis are listed also. The key thing to remember is that the "final solution" meant all Jews were to be killed. Other peoples like the Poles and Russians were allowed to live. In Poland 90% of the Jews died in the Holocaust, only 8% of the Poles died in the war. Almost all of the 10% of the Polish Jews that survived were refugees in the USSR. The case of the Jews was differant than the others. Take Gays for example. In Germany there were 1.5 million Gays ony 10,000 died in the camps--Woogie10w (talk) 02:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

This isn't a history book. The only point to be made is that Jewish Holocaust is not a proper term for the column. This is confusing and misleading. I don't see what problem there is with stating (Jews only) after the term "victims" or "deaths". Or perhaps simply "Jewish deaths".--75.31.251.168 (talk) 02:55, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked as suspected sock

This IP address has been blocked temporarily.
Suspected sockpuppet evidence has determined that this IP address is being used abusively;
the address has been blocked to prevent further abuse.
If you are a registered user and are seeing this message, please post {{unblock|reason for unblock here}} on your talk page, with a note
referencing this message. Please be sure to include the IP address (which should appear at the bottom of the block message).
Administrators: Please consult with the blocking administrator who placed the block before unblocking.

Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


What the hell is your problem? Why did you block me, you fool?--75.31.251.168 (talk) 02:59, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Because you're making the same edits as banned user TyrusThomas4lyf. And reacting with the same sort of personal attacks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)