User talk:75.3.227.21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of 71.156.47.81‎.
Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/71.156.47.81‎ for evidence.

Account information: block log – current autoblocks – edits – logs

[edit] October 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Grey's Anatomy. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Maelwys 00:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ya, you should warn those people who have several fake accounts

You're the only person that's gone past 2, and nobody has fake accounts. --Maelwys 00:20, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

really? can you not read? Fredrick day, who is that?

Okay, while I was posting this he made the third reversion. But that's still only three, you've made at least 5 (not even counting the dozens you'd done as different IPs earlier). --Maelwys 00:23, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

is this site called reverting site or the encyclopedia? feel free to delete anything that i wrote which is not the fact, otherwise, stop engaging reverting war with me. you can't deny the truth

As I explained before: The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. Please follow that link and read the article. In particular the second line - "Verifiable" in this context means that any reader should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. What you are posting about has never been written and published in a reliable source before, so it is considered original research. In order for it to be notable enough to warrant inclusion here, it has to first be notable enough for somebody else, somewhere else to write about it. If you can find an article in a magazine or newspaper or book or whatever, where somebody has written about how ER/House/Grey's Anatomy hasn't had enough Asian actors in it, then you can quote that article and include that paragraph. Until then, it doesn't belong here, no matter how true it is. --Maelwys 00:31, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Grey's Anatomy. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Jéské(v^_^v) 00:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

—Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 02:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)