User talk:75.27.41.134

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Catgut (talk) 23:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Wow! Thanks!

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Thanks, SineBot!

May 2008

  • On the contrary, my recent edit does not constitute vandalism. I made a legitimate edit (one which improves the article) and I described my changes in the edit summary.
Sorry, I meant to remove the warning, but I was distracted by my brother. J.delanoygabsadds 19:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
  •  ??? All right, then.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Incest between twins. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ZimZalaBim talk 19:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Read the edit summaries - the reasons you provide do not fit with the speedy deletion criteria. Do NOT place this tag again. There are other deletion procedures you can follow, if you truly feel this article should be removed. --ZimZalaBim talk 19:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:ZimZalaBim, you will be blocked from editing. haz (talk) 20:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 20:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Any user except for the person who originally created the article, can remove a speedy deletion tag from an article. If you think that Incest between twins should be removed, go the WP:PROD or WP:AFD route. Please also read WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Corvus cornixtalk 20:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Slakr, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: User talk:Slakr was changed by 75.27.41.134 (u) (t) deleting 8668 characters on 2008-06-09T04:46:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Slakr. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: User:Slakr was changed by 75.27.41.134 (u) (t) deleting 14638 characters on 2008-06-09T04:46:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 04:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your comments on User talk:J.delanoy: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 04:47, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires.

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)