User talk:75.153.84.91

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Greg Felton. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as the text has been restored from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 20:49, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Greg Felton, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. I think you know the drill for this one. clpo13(talk) 00:27, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Let me assure you that I am ONLY interested in neutrality. It is eternalsleeper who is the problem.

Voxveritatis 18:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Be that as it may, please keep WP:CIVIL in mind. Gloating is not the sign of someone truly interested in neutrality. Besides, Eternalsleeper doesn't necessarily have the conflict of interest you do. As the page is about you, you are the one who needs be extra careful with your edits. That is why I posed the COI notice. I can easily understand Eternalsleeper's concern at your removal of information that puts you in a potentially negative light, even if I agree the information isn't notable enough to belong in the article. --clpo13(talk) 06:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE deletions to Greg Felton's page

I have replied at User talk:DoubleBlue#RE deletions to Greg Felton's page. DoubleBlue (Talk) 17:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)