User talk:74.225.175.133

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 74.225.175.133, is registered to Bellsouth. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Bellsouth to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Bellsouth, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

[edit] Exactly

"actually it's fine to remove the warnings if he saw them". [1] Exactly. And Cirt knows that damn well. --74.225.175.133 (talk) 04:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

But it won't get you out of being blocked however. Momusufan (talk) 04:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for what? For wondering what in the hell got into Cirt to repeatedly troll my talk page? --74.225.175.133 (talk) 04:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

This appears to be a content dispute at Shawn Lonsdale, please read WP:Dispute resolution. Momusufan (talk) 04:38, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

No dispute. Cirt and I already worked it out. Believe it or not we actually have a history of working this stuff out. Just usually some fireworks to accompany. Thanks for your interest, though --74.225.175.133 (talk) 04:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Unblock

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Idiotic pseudo-admin blocks the IP of an editor in good standing as a "sock". Gimme a break!"

Decline reason: "Unblock requests that include a personal attack will not be seriously considered. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:12, 2 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Brand spanking new admin blocks the IP of an editor in good standing as a "sock". Gimme a break!"

Decline reason: "Can't give a break but I can give you a bit of good advice, don't make anymore personal attacks because it might get the block extended. — Ѕandahl 07:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Reviewing admin, please note, this unblock request was originally made by this IP, but amended by 72.144.8.24 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log). Blueboy96 07:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)