User talk:74.225.10.140

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] February 2008

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:J.delanoy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. J.delanoygabsadds 16:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

74.225.10.140 (talk) 16:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:J.delanoy. J.delanoygabsadds 16:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


Commenting is not vandalism. Yet another reason why they are NOT going to make you an administrator. 74.225.10.140 (talk) 16:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Blocked for multiple reverts on Magic Kingdom article. When the block expires, do NOT make the same change to the article UNLESS you establish consensus on the article's talk page to do so. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 17:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I was making corrections that can be proven 100% accurate. I thought this was encyclopedia concerned with FACTS, not about what some commercial tourism enterprises may think; I guess I was wrong"

Decline reason: "You have not addressed the reason for your block, which is edit warring. Have you read WP:EW and WP:3RR? — Yamla (talk) 17:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I will leave it to another admin to respond to the above unblock request. However, it should be noted that merely because you are right does NOT give you the right act in a way that is counter to standard behavioral guidelines at Wikipedia. If you are right, there is a completely civil and "within-the-rules" way to get your 100% accurate edit into an article. Violating the three revert rule is NOT it. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 17:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)