User talk:74.163.223.145

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by Miamiboyzinhere.
Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Miamiboyzinhere for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

[edit] February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Magic Kingdom. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 01:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

the edits are correct. You are the one that is wrong. 74.163.223.145 (talk) 01:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Walt Disney World Resort. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. —C.Fred (talk) 01:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

But *I* am the one that is reverting vandalism. Block the others who are vandalizing, not me. 74.163.223.145 (talk) 01:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring. Your edits showed a tendancy to work against established consensus and a reluctance to discuss the nature of your edits.. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —C.Fred (talk) 01:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "My edits are correct and can be proven by multiple sources, including maps. I don't understand how a "consensus" can be reached when there is an obvious disagreement AND the correct sourced way is not allowed."

Decline reason: "However, nowhere have you discussed your edits; you've just made and remade them. Your edit history also suggests you're the sockpuppet of a blocked user, so there's a secondary issue of whether you're using this IP to evade a block. —C.Fred (talk) 01:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.