User talk:74.14.128.26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You know, you can wait until tomorrow (and probably later), before adjusting the numbers for the Quebec elections. It doesn't really make a difference whether the PLQ got 33.03 or 33.05% of the popular vote.--Boffob 03:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

FYI Liberals got 38 seats according to the Quebec election site. take a look bub.

My point is that you don't need to adjust the numbers every minute (especially passed the decimal point). Wait until tomorrow. There will surely be recounts anyway, delaying the final official results by days.--Boffob 04:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Saskatchewan general election, 2007, you will be blocked from editing. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 02:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

I am NOT being disruptive, I'm watching the results and stating facts. I would think you should be warned for erasing facts!!! 74.14.128.26 03:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

You've twice added results that are 1. unofficial and 2. completely wrong -Royalguard11(T·R!) 03:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

The results I added (36 to 22, were one seat change off thank you very much. And would you expect people to wait to put up the vote count for each party because its unofficial? No, I didn't think so, sounds pretty silly I know. 74.14.128.26 12:18, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Green Party of Canada

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Green Party of Canada. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.

I don't think I'm in the middle of any war. I'm adding helpful information to the site and I shouldn't be warned for doing so. I've spent hours working on this, and it should be on the page. 74.14.128.26 00:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. J (talk) 15:18, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Green Party of Canada. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. J (talk) 15:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. J (talk) 15:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Green Party of Ontario & Green Party of Alberta

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. J (talk) 05:20, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Green Party of Canada, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. The other contributors who have reverted your edits due to lack of source citations are not conspiring against you. They are trying to maintain the quality of the encyclopedia by removing inaccurate information and other information that is not supported by reference citations (see WP:Verifiablity). Please heed the messages you are receiving, instead of just reverting other people's changes. --Orlady (talk) 05:22, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

If you need help on citing sources, check out WP:CITE, it has a pretty good primer on what is required. You can also ask any of us on our talk pages. (I suggest Orlady since I'll be heading to bed shortly.) J (talk) 05:25, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

For the record, WP:Verifiability says (at WP:SPS) "Articles and posts on Wikipedia should never be used as third-party sources." Thus, at least one of the sources you have cited is not acceptable under WP policy. --Orlady (talk) 18:04, 18 November 2007 (UTC)