User talk:74.133.52.253

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Welcome! 2 Thank you... 3 Re: Spelling changes 4 RE: Warning 5 Comment about Bill Clinton edit on Bearly541 talk page

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

• The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
• The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
• The ability to start new pages.
• The ability to rename pages.
• The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
• The ability to upload images.
• The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
• The eligibility to eventually become an administrator.
• Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign your posts and comments with four tildes (~~~~), which will let others know who left it. Fabricationary 22:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you...

[...For helping revert vandalism on Wikipedia. It's much appreciated. -- Zanimum 16:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Spelling changes

Hi, you recently posted on User_talk:67.151.178.146 about Spelling Changes. You said that the version of English doesn't matter as long it is consistent throughout. The problem is that he is changing random bits from a bunch of articles from American English to British English. So, even though he may be changing the style, he's not doing it throughout, and that's why he's received so many warnings. --Nishkid64 21:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Warning

Took it off. Bearly541 21:13, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Bill Clinton. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Bearly541 01:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page User talk:74.133.52.253 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Æon ^{Insane Ward} 01:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Based from the otherwise good edit history, I think this user just made a mistake on Bill Clinton. Maybe you should get an username? -- Chris 73 | Talk 01:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comment about Bill Clinton edit on Bearly541 talk page

Hi, It's late and I'm tired (it's 4 am here!) so maybe I just missed it - but I don't understand what edits you're talking about on the Bill Clinton talk page. Here are two options (I'm sure there are more): 1) provide the diff so it's obvious to me or 2) just go edit the Clinton article. I've added it to my watch list so if I think that there's something inappropriate I'll let you know. btw, you might want to register and get a username :-) Brian 02:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)btball

Hi again, I don't see an edit in the Bill Clinton article history with a time stamp of 1:26 ... but if you're concerned with Bearly's labelling of you as a vandal, don't worry about it. The edit history's speak for themselves and User Bearly has decided to leave Wikipedia. I might still be missing something here - is there anything that you think needs to be changed in the Bill Clinton article? If so, let me know. If you're just worried about the vandalism assertion - don't be worried. Brian 02:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)btball

Hi again, I see this edit by you [1] that seems to be the edit in question by both Bearly and Aeon. It's then followed by this [2] edit reverting your changes. Bearly's comment about adding nonsense doesn't make sense and it might be ok to remove it. Can you tell me what happened here? It does look like you blanked out a section of the page. Was that an accident? If I were you, I wouldn't remove either of the warnings but after I understand what happened here I might be convinced to do it for you (and defend my actions if necessary). Thanks Brian 05:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)btball

I saw the user's edit, and I thought it looked like intentional blanking. That's why I reverted it. Bearly541 21:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

---

This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]