User talk:72.74.216.208

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Editing Hint

Hi there, just to let you know, once a debate has been closed, and the debate states that it is now a archive, you should no longer edit it like you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chet Jablonski, next time please be more careful and do not edit discussions or debates that have been closed, thank you. Tiptoety 21:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I realize that, thus my removing the previous comment. In my defense, the template used stated there was a present discussion already taking place. The fault in my view seems to be with the editor who misused a {{afd}} instead of the more appropriate {{prod}} template. 72.74.216.208 22:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chet Jablonski

Thanks for your comment. I have looked at the text of the deleted page, as it stood during the deletion debate and as it stood immediately before deletion today, and I cannot see any substantial addition which demonstrates the notability of the subject. I do see that more context and history has been added but that material doesn't address the notability issue which is covered by guidance in this page. If the page had previously only been deleted as a result of speedy deletion, then I would have put it to a debate, but the previous deletion debate is a material consideration.

I may have got this wrong. If so you can get the opinion of others by submitting a request for deletion review. Sam Blacketer 22:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I have filed a deletion review over Chet Jablonski; please join the debate there. Sam Blacketer 23:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)