User talk:72.10.97.6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 72.10.97.6, is registered to State of Connecticut Dept of InformationTechnology CONNECTICUTEDUCATIONNETWORK , and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

[edit] May 2006

Your recent edit to Thurgood Marshall was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 13:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to César Chávez, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronbo76 17:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on César Chávez. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Six edits. Ronbo76 17:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to César Chávez, you will be blocked from editing. Ronbo76 17:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Samuel Slater, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. —LOL (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Samuel Slater, you will be blocked from editing. —LOL (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Samuel Slater. EJF (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the First Battle of Bull Run page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Daysleeper47 (talk) 19:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Battle of Fredericksburg, you will be blocked from editing. Philip Trueman (talk) 16:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Battle of Fredericksburg. GtstrickyTalk or C 16:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Dreadstar † 17:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vicksburg, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Vicksburg was changed by 72.10.97.6 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-29T16:13:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Talk:Sherman's March to the Sea constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 16:16, 29 April 2008 (UTC))

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mississippi has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. AVandtalkcontribs 16:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)