User talk:71.80.32.10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Into the Woods may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. --omtay38 22:58, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] A smile for you

omtay38 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

[edit] September 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to WCYB-TV, you will be blocked from editing. NeutralHomer T:C 01:15, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to WCYB-TV, you will be blocked from editing. NeutralHomer T:C 22:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] October 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to WCYB-TV, you will be blocked from editing. This is the ONLY warning you will recieve about your continued vandalism to the WCYB page. Schedules are NOT allowed under WP:NOT#DIR and you have been told of this. You have ignored this rule and continue to add schedules to this page, which is vandalism. If it happens again, you will be blocked! Stop now. NeutralHomer T:C 20:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You are being reported to AIV for continued vandalism. - NeutralHomer T:C 21:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger 21:20, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "True, I have been persistent in making edits. So has Neutralhomer. I do not feel that these edits fall within the category of vandalism. I think that the listing of newscasts is appropriate for this entry... at least as valid as all of the other listings included in the article. Neutralhomer does not. I add them; he removes them. Somehow my actions are vandalism and his are not? I'm confused. I contend this is a content dispute, not vandalism. If my edits are vandalism then his are equally so and he should likewise be blocked. 71.80.32.10 11:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "Sit out the block. — jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 14:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Hi, the recent edit you made to USA PATRIOT Act has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 03:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Sock monkey page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki 17:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Sock monkey, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 18:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Your recent edit to Nursing (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Nursing constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 15:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bullshit. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Waggers (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2008 (UTC)