User talk:71.231.130.56

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP address has been used by Kimberly Ashton based on Checkuser evidence.
See contribs — all logs — block log


This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Thank you for experimenting with the page Alyson Michalka on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Yamla 02:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Alyson Michalka, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Yamla 02:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Amanda Michalka. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Yamla 02:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Amanda Michalka, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Yamla 20:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Alyson Michalka, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Yamla 03:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Yamla 14:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

Fair use

Thanks for adding the picture to the article on Alyson Michalka. Unfortunately, you forgot to add the mandatory detailed fair-use rationale and so I had to revert your addition. --Yamla 21:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 48 hours. You have already been told that any use of a copyrighted image needs a detailed fair-use rationale but you still decided to add one to Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen without providing this information. --Yamla 14:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a week. Fair-use rationales are not optional and chronic copyright infringements are treated very seriously. If you are caught doing this again, your next block will be for much longer. --Yamla 19:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, I see you are simply ignoring the warnings. You have been blocked for a month. --Yamla 21:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Will I get a say in this? I am innocent! Someone has stole my IP address.

If you tell me that you have never edited an article on Alyson Michalka or on Amanda Michalka or Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen, I will unblock you immediately. --Yamla 21:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, Mr. Yamla! I did not vandalize either pages. I'll call my friend and I'll tell her I now know what she did and you don't have to block us ever again. Not ever did I edit Alyson Michalka or Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen.

Okay, you should be unblocked now. Note that sometimes the unblock doesn't "take" so if you still can't edit, let me know. Please note that your friend may be completely innocent, it's possible that your IP address was originally used by someone else. --Yamla 22:20, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and I think it's great that you revert vandalism. But I did not vandalize or have edited either one of the articles about the twins or the Michalka girls. --The one who is confused, angry and wanting to kill my friend, although I can not becaus she's in Russia

I am unblocked! Thank you so much. Now I won't have to kill my friend. You can restart the warning cycle because all of this was my friends fault. --The one whose temper has been eased by an angel named Yamla, better known as the girl from Manitoba. You can leave comments on my user page, User:Bethicalyna.

If you are really Lindsay1980, then please log in before you edit your user page. Otherwise, your edits could be mistaken as vandalism and removed. Thank you. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 19:46, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop targeting one or more user's pages or talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking, as you did with User:Bethicalyna. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. tmopkisn tlka 23:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, someone keeps on adding weird edits to User:Bethicalyna, if that's your username, please log in so the edits aren't accidentally reverted, if it's not, well then... don't edit it. If you haven't made any edits to that page then I guess there's nothing you can do, but I'd tell your friend to stay off of your computer because she could get you blocked. tmopkisn tlka 00:01, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Anna Kournikova. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Sopranosmob781 04:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Yamla 19:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

I didn't do it

I am not even on. My little sister is using my account. I told her not to. I got your messages. I showed her how to upload and she knows how to read and stuff. I never did anything, I just got back on.

Someone using this IP address committed yet another act of copyright/fair-use infringement. Hence, this IP address is being blocked. It would help if you folks would sign in rather than editing anonymously. --Yamla 19:52, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Could you just unblock me and I'll talk to my sisters?.
No. The repeated copyright and fair-use violations have been doing on for almost two months now. This IP address has previously been given the benefit of the doubt. The block should only affect editing anonymously, it should not affect any registered accounts. --Yamla 20:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
It affected my account. Are you happy now? I read your messages, my sister used my account, uploaded and I get blocked even though I listened. I need to go to the bathroom. I'll be back. Why don't you talk to my sister! I'll prove it to you.
If this is Lindsay1980, please immediately cease using this account. You have been blocked and as noted, you are not permitted to use another account for the duration of the block. If this is not, please let me know who you are and why you believe a block on an anonymous account has prevented you from editing while signed in. Alternatively, if you are complaining about being prevented from editing using this anonymous account, that was the point. --Yamla 20:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Yamla, this is Bethicalyna. It is true about my sisters uploading from Lindsay's account. She is not doing anything wrong, and I hope you'll understand. She didn't do anything, but now the whole family is blocked and my Dad is in the process of creating an account for Judith so she won't have to use Lindsay's anymore. Please unblock us. I will talk to mom so she can talk some sense into Judith and to tell Judith to respect the policies in our household, which is ask before you use, I am sorry. Judith is very vain and selfish, and she pobably doesn't care. Please unblock us. Lindsay will talk some sense into Judith, the whole family will. As long as we're unblocked, since we threatened to ground Judith, she solemnly swore that she would not use any other accounts our hack in to anyone elses. Good day, This is my reason.
Lindsay did do something wrong. She allowed her account to be used by another user. It is entirely up to her to prevent this from happening. The block on that account stands. However, I will unblock the anonymous account but please note that any further copyright or fair-use infringements committed by this anonymous user will result in a substantial block, most likely two months. I strongly urge everyone who uses this account to refrain from uploading any images and to refrain from adding any images to Wikipedia articles. Most likely the reason the other users were blocked, by the way, is that Lindsay tried editing while blocked. This would place an autoblock on everyone else using the same computer. --Yamla 20:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Yamla. Give the kid a break! She came from Croatia, computer's are knew to her, she didn't know what to do and she reads slowly! Blame her why don't you! She is really sensitive. Now she quit Wikipedia.

She got a break. This is her first block despite numerous warnings about copyright and fair-use problems. The block is only for 24 hours. Please understand, I am not doing this to be malicious but Wikipedia must take copyright and fair use violations very seriously. Wikipedia could be sued out of existence if we do not. We cannot sit by and allow a user to continue this behaviour after multiple warnings. I am sorry that she has chosen to leave Wikipedia and I hope she changes her mind. --Yamla 21:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. This is her first blocking.

Um

You asked: "How many users can one ip have? We plan to have 9 users on our IP."

There's no limit. However, essentially all users sharing the same IP will be held accountable for the actions of a single one of them. If any of the 9 are blocked, for example, all nine will be blocked automatically. --Yamla 04:27, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Block

How long am I blocked? My mom edits! Help me! What did I do! I will threaten to sue! --71.231.130.56 21:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

If you threaten to sue, you will be blocked under WP:LEGAL until your legal action is completed. And please note that while your account is blocked, you are not permitted to make edits such as this one. Note that I am not the blocking admin and am working with other admins to get you unblocked but you must be on your best behaviour while this happens. --Yamla 19:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Birthday

Hey! Just noticed in my userpage history your edit of changing my age. That was nice of you, thanks.

Looks like you're going to get blocked soon... stay outta trouble!

Troubleshooter 21:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello

I guess this works. Troubleshooter 22:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Blocked

This IP address has been blocked for one month. There is a long history of abusive edits coming from this account. Most recently, Bethicalyna has been editing from this address (see this edit) despite being blocked. There is also a long history of sockpuppetry amongst a number of users editing from this account. We have previously assumed good faith with a number of accounts all editing from this account but continued abusive edits have exhausted my patience. For now, this block should only affect the IP, not already existing accounts editing from this address. --Yamla 22:29, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I am fine. Whateer you want, have at it, I am leaving and I am busy, so don't bother responding. Whatev. --71.231.130.56 23:50, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Block has been reset. Yet another sockpuppet account (Ghettogirl) was created. Given that even the less abusive accounts created from this address are primarily using Wikipedia as a social networking site which is not permitted (see WP:NOT), I have extended the block on this address. --Yamla 17:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
wHY ARE YOU BLAMING ME? Stop it. I have only been using my account and my account only, and I didn't create another. Unless Cute 1 4 u is using my account stop it. You're tap dancing on my last good nerve because I didn't do anything because I can't create an account! Qhy blame me?Go to cute 1 4 u. --71.231.130.56 18:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
A large number of abusive sockpuppets have been created using this account. Additionally, this account has been used by blocked users to continue editing. I note also that you have not signed your name here. Overall, there is simply too much abuse coming from this address to allow it to continue editing. --Yamla 18:28, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
yOU'VE GOT IT ALL WRONG. I was just trying to expierement with articles. The gossip was from other sites, and I wasn't sure how to cite things. I am truly honestly sorry. I just add information to articles because I think the info is true. I've tried to make good resoutceful edits which lead me to get blocked. --71.231.130.56 23:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Where I can be found

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I don't mean for vandalism. I put things that I get from other sites, but I sometimes forget to cite them. Then I get in trouble. It's not my intention. I added images but I did not know their liscences. Please forgive me. Fine, I'm blocked for one month. I'm just telling you that it's not my intention. This site is a little to complicated and I didn't know all the policies. Anyways, I'm 14 and here is where I can be found: . My name is Kimberly Ashton and I use comcast. You do not have to lift the block yet but I just want to see if my apology would help. :( --71.231.130.56 22:57, 15 September 2006 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "You've been blocked numerous times and yet still forget, this suggest to me that you will never learn and never remember and as such are a danger to the project, you are certainly doing a good job of convincing me that the block should be indefinite. --pgk 12:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Unfotunately you've been blocked, and claimed ignorance, so many times that this is running thin. Daniel.Bryant 05:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)simple:User:Kimberly Ashton