User talk:71.198.218.222

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] JFK II: The Bush Connection

A user using this IP address has made several non-neutral point of view edits to JFK II: The Bush Connection, such as this series of edits. Please, review the appropriate Wikipedia policies for original research and citation of sources. Wikipedia is not a place to make a point. -Harmil 16:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC) Harmil,

To the editor of the above article: first off, please create an account. This is all much easier when communicating with a real user rather than an IP address.
If you have opinions about the John F. Kennedy assassination, please bring them to that article, not the article about a documentary film. Further, do not confuse secondary sources with primary sources. There are almost no primary sources cited in this film. It contains footage from other documentaries and dramatic films (along with cartoons such as the Simpsons and South Park), and much of that has been taken out of context. Really, the only primary source in this film is the document that mentions Bush, and we do mention that in the article. If you're looking for a good documentary film about JFK's assassination, go to a library. There are plenty.
Also, do not assume that you know my opinion on anything related to this. I assure you that you do not. -Harmil 19:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


Harmil, to say something like, "Ths film also cites popular culture as evidence", is a misleading statemnet, leaving the reader with the impression that clips of the Simpsons and South Park are as good as evidence as Hankey has, or that Hankey was even using those clips as evidence. This is flat out misrepresentation of the subject matter and sources of the film. How can you not mnention in this section (I know you mention it in a later section) about Hankey's most credible evidence, such as declassified documents and historic video footage and interviews?

I know that the article in question is a film review and not the JFK discussion article, which is elsewhere. But the film review should be objective and not mislead people about the actual content and sources used in the film. I felt that my edits more objectively portrayed the actual subject matter and sources of JFK II.

Again, who gets to be the arbiter in a situation like this? I think you are being biased and unreasonable. Who do I go to?

I just created an account "Cianan"