User talk:71.185.142.181

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Phoeba WrightOBJECTION! 20:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

This is because of multiple edits of yours. In addition, your Ref Desk post is clearly trolling, do not do it again -- Phoeba WrightOBJECTION! 20:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

This IP has been blocked for this unacceptable edit. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 20:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I got hot due to Feba's intolerance but I'm cool now. It won't happen again."

Decline reason: "Please take the next 24 hours to look over our policies. Edits such as this and the rather blatant one above are clearly not acceptable. Kuru talk 21:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Note To admin reviewing unblock, see user's other edits. Vandalism/trolling only account -- Phoeba WrightOBJECTION! 21:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Note To admin, the person who wrote a note above is Feba, the intolerant editor. In addition, I made constructive edits, to Assassin (game), for example.--71.185.142.181 21:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Which was a removal of sourced content -- Phoeba WrightOBJECTION! 21:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Just because something has a source doesn't mean it is pertinent for an encyclopedia. I removed it for this reason, escpecially since it was not at all notable.--71.185.142.181 21:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm not here to discuss this with you or try to reason with you. If you want to defend yourself to an admin, I will point out the flaws in your statements. Generally, unless something is wildly offtopic, if it has a source, you discuss it on the talk page before you remove it -- Phoeba WrightOBJECTION! 21:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Then why didn't you discuss it on the talk page before reverting my question? GOTCHA!--71.185.142.181 21:27, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Because your comment is obviously trolling and inflammatory, is a question, not valid content on an article, and doesn't cite sources -- Phoeba WrightOBJECTION! 21:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

By the way, why did nobody notice that I reverted my own vandalism with the "Fuck you nigger!"?--71.185.142.181 21:29, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

We noticed, the fact that you made the edit at all shows your intentions however -- Phoeba WrightOBJECTION! 21:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You do realize...

That insulting me isn't going to help your case at all, right? =/ -- Phoeba WrightOBJECTION! 21:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

I was not insulting you, merely describing you in relation to your recent actions.--71.185.142.181 21:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Calling another editor intolerant is a fairly obvious insult. Really, As much as I'd like to see you turn into a helpful wikipedia editor, you don't seem to be willing to change -- Phoeba WrightOBJECTION! 21:17, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
I did not mean it as an insult, but you did express intolerance for my way of life by reverting my question, and that is a fact.--71.185.142.181 21:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)