User talk:71.168.117.44

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 71.168.117.44, is registered to Verizon Internet Services Inc.. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Verizon Internet Services Inc. to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Verizon Internet Services Inc., to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

If you're interested in contributing to Wikipedia, I suggest you start with our civility and no personal attacks policy. I'm not interested in your insults, and no, bullying will have the opposite effect from the one you intend. Goodbye again, Antandrus (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Just to remind you that you are still blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Personal Attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Antandrus is punishing mechelzidek way too harshly"

Decline reason: "What? Please give a reason for your request and I would be happy to take a look at it. — Tiptoety talk 05:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "My reason is I made a NPOV violation and Antandrus overreacted. He told me to read a few policies and I did. I was happy to see the part about no personal attacks against someone even if they've been disciplined, and the part about people making mistakes. Antandrus has a very definite view of the world and does not respect people with a different view."

Decline reason: "No. Abusing multiple accounts is not tolerated. It is only a short block, ride it out. — Tiptoety talk 06:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "the block on mechelzidek is indefinite, antandrus is awfully active, almost like the Israeli lobby"

Decline reason: "Between the antisemitic overtones of that statement and this edit with its implied outing you deserve this block. Last request; next one will be considered frivolous and disruptive and will result in the page being protected and a possible extension of the block. —15:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I have deleted the last unblock request since it had absolutely nothing to do with this block. As per my promise above ..

You have been blocked for a period of 72 hours for abusing the unblock template with an antisemitic rant. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

And I am also protecting this page for the duration of that block. Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

It appears you are abusing the unblock template, abuse it again and this talk page will be protected. Momusufan (talk) 16:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)