User talk:71.159.60.241

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] July 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Architecture of Africa. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gscshoyru 16:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


[edit] Vandalism

Dear Gscshoyru, I never vandalized any article. I merely reverted to one that distinguishes between North Africa and sub-saharan Black Africa, because it makes little sense to write about the architecture of "africa" when the two regions have no connections. I also believe the tags are useful. What makes you think this is vandalism? wikipedia is a free encyclopedia that anyone can edit, supposedly.

To be totally honest... your edits are identical to another ip just yesterday, who was blocked by an admin for the same edits. I'm using that as my reference point. Try debating on the talk page, first. Gscshoyru 16:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
  • There appears to be some POV pushing and likely sockpuppetry. --Kinu t/c 17:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


POV? for removing the criticism section? You should have warned me before, you fuckwit. Anyway, go fuck yourself. Wikipedia's days are over, because it's full of ignorant cunts like you who want to democratize "knowledge" lmao but instead control it like Nazis.

  • No warning is required before blocking a suspected sockpuppet of an indefinitely blocked user. --Kinu t/c 17:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

lmao@knowledge, most articles are full of lowbrow filth, you pedantic follower. Allah Ow Akbar.

Funny how even though you have such a low view of wikipedia, you persist to making unwanted changes to articles. If yuo don't like it, than don't use it. Simple as that--Redwolf75 21:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)