User talk:71.158.252.222

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, adsl-71-158-252-222.dsl.amrltx.sbcglobal.net, is registered to AT&T, an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


Contents

[edit] Shamrock, Texas

Why do you people insist on removing proven facts that are clearly cited by numerous media and courthouse records? These facts are a part of this town's "personality". Aperson is seriously taking their life into their own hands to live there. I know. I've been there. The people will kill you and think about it later if they feel their drug-trade is in any way threatened. Courthouse officials are in prison because they are confesed drug dealers and users. Don't you think these facts need to remain available to the unsuspecting public who may pass by that area? I do! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.158.252.222 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 9 March 2008

Wikipedia:Neutral point of view can help you decide what is more appropriate for editing pages in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.113.99.153 (talk) 23:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] March 2008

  1. Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Shamrock, Texas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 07:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] April 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to U-Drop Inn, you will be blocked from editing. Collectonian (talk) 13:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.