User talk:71.139.55.87

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Wikipedia:No legal threats

You know, Jack, it's been explained to you numerous times, but legal threats like the this -- no matter how empty, bogus, and unenforcable -- aren't allowed here. Don't do it. --Calton | Talk 00:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] you are blocked for 48 hours

In response to this legal threat, I have banned you for 48 hours. -lethe talk + 00:14, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to User:Lethe, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 01:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Please read this page for information on what a talk page is, and how to use is. Continuing to post nonsense, threats, or attempts at communication on a user's user page may be seen as vandalism. Thanks. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 01:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image

I've uploaded an image of Sarfatti with Geller from the directory you wanted to link to. I'm currently claiming fair use for it, but it would be better if Wikipedia could use it under a so-called creative commons licence, which would mean the copyright holder would retain copyright, but that Wikipedia and its mirrors (and anyone who copies them) could use it freely. If you're the copyright holder, would you be willing to release the image under a creative commons licence? SlimVirgin (talk) 04:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

See Creative_Commons_License for more information. It is the "attribution by" licence I would like to use. Note that we're not allowed to use the non-commercial-only licence. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 04:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal details

I understand that you feel frustrated about your article. However, I have to tell you that, if you post what you believe are someone's personal details again, you're likely to be blocked indefinitely. This will mean that, even if you obtain new IP addresses, all your edits will be reverted on sight as soon as people suspect it's you. Please don't let things develop to that point. Discuss any objections you have to the current version on the talk page, please. Many thanks, SlimVirgin (talk) 21:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Of course, I now recall that you already are banned, so I suppose all I can do is ask you not to post what you believe are personal details again, because it's regarded as harassment, and they'll be quickly deleted anyway, so it's a waste of time. If you still have concerns about your article, you're welcome to e-mail me about them, using the link on my user page. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC)