User talk:71.107.171.45

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Qin Jiushao

I don't know what did you meant, but pinyin is always preferably according to WP:MOS. By the you're the one who copied and pasted the article[1][2], not me, so get that straight. Eiorgiomugini 02:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

O RLY? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ch%27in_Chiu-Shao&oldid=143810518—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.107.171.45 (talk • contribs)

Let's discuss at your 'talk page', this article was created on 22 April 2004 under Qin Jiushao, which was later redirected by you [3]. Eiorgiomugini 02:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

BTW, Q is not supposed to make a Ch sound; it's supposed to make a K sound. Pinyin violates the basic rules of English. Anyway, you are not supposed to cut and paste articles on Wikipedia.--71.107.171.45 02:29, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
It was not redirected by me, but the so-called "article" was only a very short sentence. Ch'in Chiu-Shao is an entirely different article. [4]--71.107.171.45 02:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Who cares if is violated the basic rules of English, so far I was moving it accordingly per MoS. Still that article was initially created under Qin Jiushao. I can see that User:Curps actually moved Ch'in Chiu-Shao to Qin Jiushao on 18:36, 22 June 2004. Eiorgiomugini 02:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

No, that was an entirely different article that only consisted of a very short sentence.--71.107.171.45 02:34, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
So, you are claiming that the entire long article was written by yourself? Isn't that a copyright infringement?--71.107.171.45 02:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
I also see by your rather lengthy block log that you are a "disruptive" and "uncompromising revert warrior." Well, that makes sense.--71.107.171.45 02:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

This is what was at Qin Jiushao before it was redirected: [5]. This was the original Ch'in Chiu-Shao article: [6].--71.107.171.45 02:43, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

That article appeared a year after Ch'in Chiu-Shao was moved to Qin Jiushao on 18:36, 22 June 2004, by all means it should be redirect to Qin Jiushao. Eiorgiomugini 02:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

You miss my point entirely. It is about Wikipedia:Copyright, not about which page was created first.--71.107.171.45 02:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

"I also see by your rather lengthy block log" I am sorry, but are you that guy who created the article under Ch'in Chiu-Shao named User:JarlaxleArtemis, who had been banned from editing Wikipedia, that's pretty sad. Eiorgiomugini 02:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

What? No, of course not. It looks that that loser was blocked for vandalism, I'm trying to save Wikipedia from copyright infringement.--71.107.171.45 02:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Alright, look, whoever you are, its better for you to redirect back to Qin Jiushao, instead of reverting the redirect page, furthermore, you had removed the source I added in over the past few days as well, which is vandalism. Eiorgiomugini 03:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

You should just go to Wikipedia:Requested page moves and ask an administrator to merge the two pages into one, as the notice I left on your page instructed, before you removed it.--71.107.171.45 03:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't think so, this article was initially created under Qin Jiushao on 22 April 2004, and was unreasonably moved by User:JarlaxleArtemis on 6 April 2005. I take it that you ain't new to wikipedia, you should be familiar with the MoS. Either we should moved it to Qin Jiushao, or waiting others to move it. You choose, with your destructive approach, what are you doing anyway at Wikipedia? Eiorgiomugini 03:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Actually, you are the one destroying the edit history of articles.--71.107.171.45 03:37, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

No, actually you're the one who are destorying it with your anomaly edit summaries. Eiorgiomugini 03:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

You're advice to refrain yourself from posting such WP:NPA over the talk[7], and stop getting all these issues over the context into personal. Eiorgiomugini 05:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit war in Heron's formula

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. I have blocked both you and Eiorgiomugini (talk · contribs) for 24 hours for violating the three-revert rule. In future, please refrain from this sort of edit warring. —David Eppstein 06:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Could someone please revert Eiorgiomugini (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)'s latest vandalism edit to this page? I was reverting his vandalism to it and was attempting to warn anyone who reads that page that Eiorgiomugini's edits should be regarded with careful scrutiny, judging by his extensive block log, disruptive edits, and splitting of article page histories.--71.107.171.45 06:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, this is a just and fair block because I was, after all, edit warring in Heron's formula. Eiorgiomugini, however, is now crying admin abuse [8].--71.107.171.45 06:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)