User talk:71.106.141.207

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. Mushroom (Talk) 08:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] IOC and medal count

Please do not remove the IOC from the list of organizations that use the medal ranking counting method. The IOC has used this method by convention for many decades, even if it is "unofficial". --Madchester 22:11, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

The current wording is already accurate. It indicates that the IOC uses that system, even if it is unofficial. It's quite a fair compromise in explaiing both sides of the issue. Please do not make any further reverts, or you may violate the three revert rule. Thanks. --Madchester 22:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Articles on Wikipedia must pertain to a neutral point of view. To present the system fairly, you must realize that the IOC recognizes medal counts by convention, if not officially. To discredit the organization's use of any counting mechanism entirely does not pertain to such a neutral view, especially when the organization presents medal standings and counting methodology on their official website. --Madchester 22:43, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Your not being objective,

AGAIN The Organization (IOC) DOES NOT use any system and does not recognize any medal count.

the EDITORS of the IOC website does. that's the difference.

You can not use the name of IOC the Organization (NOT the WEBSITE) and claim that they use system because they don't, It is a FACT.

And it is not a PONIT OF VIEW.

Blocking me is UNFAIR. And I'm not vandalizing, I presented a very sound and valid argument.

I'm new here so I don't know how things works here I hope someone could help me with this dispute.

How about let's make a concensus let others read our debate and let them decide what to do?71.106.141.207 01:30, 19 February 2006 (UTC)vo

--here is what I replied to you last--

In order to have a "neutral point of view" then we must consider what they "officially" believe.

AGAIN they DON'T RECOGNIZE any medal counts by convention, this is their website editors speaking thats is why at the bottom of the medal table the website editors put a note "IOC does not recognize ..."

The ORAGANIZATION or the IOC Itself does not use medal counts officially or UNOFFICIALLY PERIOD. Do you see the difference?

You are confusing two things here the ORGANIZATION(IOC) and The IOC webiste. They are completely different you see.71.106.141.207 01:52, 19 February 2006 (UTC)vo

[edit] NPOV and disruption

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. You may also be interested in reading The five pillars of Wikipedia, our Help pages, the Tutorial, the policy on citing sources, and our Manual of Style.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!


You have been blocked in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating policy against disruption. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list.

Note to sysops: Unblocking yourself should almost never be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.

--Madchester 00:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Please refer to the comments by )(admin) Chick Bowen: WP:AN/I#71.106.141.207_.2F_Madchester --Madchester 19:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Spider bite on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 23:12, 14 October 2006 (UTC)