User talk:71.100.174.134

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I replied to you at User talk:Coppertwig#Message to 71.100.x.x. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 12:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ScarianCall me Pat! 15:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "The link I posted is not SPAM and its repeated deletion tells me that the Wikipedia in now censored and may no longer be worthy of receiving content or monetary contributions."

Decline reason: "Sorry. Try reading WP:EL, but a threat to stop giving us money isn't going to get you unblocked. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

We have read WP:EL which addition of the link does not violate. As for your accusation that we have threatened you... again, you seem to think that the position of Wikipedia administrator entitles you to be uppity and arrogant rather than reasonable or just. Rather than threaten our effort has been only to provide you with a heads up as to the consequences of your doing a wrong thing, being informed of the wrong thing you have done and failing to acknowledge or correct the wrong thing you have done. The name we have for this now is "Wikipedia Administrator Arrogance" or WAA. It is the same uppity arrogance that placed Jesus Christ on the cross, the same uppity arrogance that resulted in the Holocaust, the same uppity arrogance that caused 9/11 and the same uppity arrogance that will result in the Wikipedia being treated in the same way as the library at Alexandria. Have a nice day. User:71.100.174.134 (talk) 19:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Don't care about Jesus Christ. Want you to give money