User talk:70.88.195.141

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

==Content removed from MacGyver Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to MacGyver. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —LrdChaos 16:48, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Automobile was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Knights of the Cross edit

There's a discussion in Talk:The_Dresden_Files#Knights_of_the_Cross_speculation regarding your recent edits to The Dresden Files. I've tried to find sources for your addition regarding Excalibur being either one of the swords or a 4th sword, and retained only the suggestion about Excalibur being the same as Amoracchius. If there's separate evidence elsewhere in the books about it being a different, fourth sword, it would be great if you could weigh in there with the citation, or include the citation directly in the article itself if you add the claim back in. Thanks. -- Elch Yenn (talk) 20:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC)