User talk:70.53.92.224

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Editorializing and vandalism

Your change to the page Star Trek: Enterprise was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Flex (talk|contribs) 17:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Don't blame me for this one. The editor has a point, though. --70.53.92.224 18:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Your change to the page Blood alcohol content was determined to be unhelpful and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Flex (talk|contribs) 17:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

How was that unhelpful? Some Canadian provinces use the same 0.0% limit for new drivers that Australia does. Look it up. --70.53.92.224 18:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Your edit added reference tags to references that didn't exist. That's unhelpful. --Flex (talk|contribs) 18:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Settlers of Catan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Flex (talk|contribs) 17:01, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay, this one might have been vandalism. To be fair, though, it is not an encyclopaedic picture. --70.53.92.224 18:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Gerald Ford. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Flex (talk|contribs) 17:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Don't blame me for this one. --70.53.92.224 18:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Lee Harvey Oswald, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Flex (talk|contribs) 17:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

How was that unhelpful? The article was being POV by giving complete legitimacy to government investigations, which would have a conflict of interest in this case. --70.53.92.224 18:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Regardless, additional POV editorializing is not the solution. --Flex (talk|contribs) 18:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Response

On my talk page, someone from this IP wrote:

When you are fighting vandalism, please do not target everything from the same IP address. Yes, someone has made a few vandalisms from my IP, but in stopping them you also reverted my legitimate edits and gave me warnings which I don't deserve. --70.53.92.224 18:35, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

The best way to avoid IP confusion is to create an account. --Flex (talk|contribs) 18:47, 7 January 2007 (UTC)