User talk:70.50.202.164

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] ISP Info

IP address:                     70.50.202.164
Reverse DNS:                    bas1-unionville55-1177733796.dsl.bell.ca.
Reverse DNS authenticity:       [Verified]
ASN:                            577
ASN Name:                       BACOM
IP range connectivity:          2
Registrar (per ASN):            ARIN
Country (per IP registrar):     CA [Canada]
Country Currency:               CAD [Canada Dollars]
Country IP Range:               70.48.0.0 to 70.55.255.255
Country fraud profile:          Normal
City (per outside source):      Toronto, Ontario
Country (per outside source):   CA [Canada]
Private (internal) IP?          No
IP address registrar:           whois.arin.net
Known Proxy?                    No
Link for WHOIS:                 70.50.202.164

Contents

[edit] Brigitte Gabriel

Your comments on Talk:Brigitte Gabriel are completely inappropriate. Further anti-Semitic diatribes will result in blocking. KazakhPol 01:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

There's nothing "anti semitic" about the truth. Educate yourself instead of coming off like an ignorant piece. Oh, and spare us your nauseating hypocrisy and lets see you try block some of those engaged in anti Arab and anti Muslim diatribes.


Your vandalism of Brigitte Gabriel was reverted. If you cannot edit productively then you shall not edit at all. KazakhPol 02:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

There's nothing "productive" about this despicable piece of propaganda glorifying a low-life parasitical traitor to her country and her people, who was celebrating the slaughter of her people and the bombing of her country. And, you don't get to decide who edits and who doesn't.

[edit] Vandalism Warnings

Please do not remove vandalism warnings from your own talk page. Mufka 02:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove content from a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 02:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

You will have a much better time dealing with the matter if you bring up specific points in the article that you think are unsourced or are not described neutrally. One solution is to use the [citation needed] tage when you think a point is particularly needing sourcing. JoshuaZ 02:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Brigitte Gabriel. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. Khoikhoi 03:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I've reverted you again. Your version has WP:BLP problems among other issues. In general, unless we have a good reason if there is a prexisting consensus the duty is to some extent on the new person to explicitly state what they think is wrong and generally the older version will stand until some sort of consensus emerges. This is why use of [citation needed] tags will probably work much more effectively. JoshuaZ 03:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)