User talk:70.23.104.48

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] some warns

If you wish to discuss the article and recent changes made to it by jpgordon and myself, please do so on the article's Talk page. It's unlikely anyone will see the comments on Josh's page other than you and Josh (and me, since his user talk page is on my watchlist). Thanks.—chris.lawson (talk) 23:54, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.—chris.lawson (talk) 06:40, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Just because I add something to Wikipedia that doesn't make sense to you, doesn't make it nonsense. I happen to be a very educated person, one who has studied Malcom X in a university. I would be willing to wager neither you nor jpgordon have even really spent much time studying Malcom X, except through some casual reading. I have no need to experiment in a 'sandbox'.

  • Please come discuss your changes on the talk page. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 02:23, 13 September 2005 (UTC)


Very simply because if this was a wiki about sailing boats, you wouldn't be giving me this raft of shit. You are prejudiced, and you need to either take a neutral point of view, or be removed.

I think maybe it is time for you to be removed.

I think it is time for you to have a look at Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, as well as Wikipedia:Cite sources and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Please do not make any more edits to articles until you have read and understand these pages. Failure to comply with this request will likely result in you being reported as a vandal, which, if you persist, may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia pages. Thanks.—chris.lawson (talk) 04:10, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Consider yourself reported. I am going to take action against you. You need to go.

Please, let me know how that works out. Until then, refrain from pushing a point of view on the Malcolm X article.—chris.lawson (talk) 04:32, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Three revert rule

Wikipedia policy is that you may not revert any page more than three times in a 24-hour period. For more on this policy, please see Wikipedia:3RR. You are in violation of this policy many times over, and have been reported to the administrators' noticeboard. Please cease your revert warring and discuss the edits you wish to make on the article's Talk page so that community consensus can be achieved. Thank you. —chris.lawson (talk) 05:22, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for clear violation of Wikipedia's three revert rule after having been warned. When the block expires, please make use of the talk page at talk:Malcolm X to discuss suggested changes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me by emailing me here. — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 18:44, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WP:Civil

If you cannot be civil, you will likely be blocked again.

Until you learn how to properly cite reliable sources, your edits will continue to be reverted.

Furthermore, Alex Haley is not a germane topic to Malcolm X. Please refrain from attempting to impugn his credibility on the Malcolm X page. Thank you. —chris.lawson (talk) 00:53, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Still at it, eh?

I see that your recent discussions with Asbestos and your 24-hour block for violation of the 3RR have had absolutely no effect on your unwillingness to discuss this edit with other Wikipedians on the article's Talk page.

A word to the not-so-wise and oh-so-racist: you'll get a lot further in life if you're willing to talk things through with people, rather than stonewalling. Anonymous editors who insist on stonewalling people find themselves blocked, for increasingly long periods of time after each incident.

If you believe you have something useful to contribute to Wikipedia, you will change your behaviour and learn to work within the guidelines and policies established here. If not, well, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.—chris.lawson (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

But I haven't done anything wrong . . .

[edit] Malcom X

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. CambridgeBayWeather 03:10, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

  • This message is regarding the article User talk:Drini. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [1] -- (☺drini♫|☎) 03:21, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Regarding User talk:Drini ([2]) -- (☺drini♫|☎) 03:24, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

I'd love it if you could explain what the hell the curliness of Malcolm X's hair has to do with his nickname of "Detroit Red." Not that I expect anything rational from someone who refers to educated black men as "f***ing n***ers."—chris.lawson (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Maybe for a stupid mex fruit-picker like you, Malcom X is considered educated. Malcom X got most of his education in jail reading the dictionary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.104.48 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 21 September 2005

No, I was referring to that supposed college professor you're using as a scapegoat for your hatred of non-white people. You remember him, right? I mean, he did screw up your entire life because you didn't get a 4.0 GPA in "college," didn't he?</sarcasm>—chris.lawson (talk) 03:49, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Oh, and for what it's worth, blanking your own Talk page is considered to be vandalism as well. Stop it.—chris.lawson (talk) 03:34, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Despite all the warning hiding, and because of [3], you sir have been blocked. -- (☺drini♫|☎) 03:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

It's like your leader beggar boy Vincente Fox says -- you wetbacks do the shit jobs that even American blacks won't do. He's right. I see you wetbacks cleaning my crap out of the toilet every day up here in the US. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.104.48 (talk • contribs) 23:42, 21 September 2005

You've been blocked for racist comments and personal attacks, after one week if you feel that you can behave feel free to come back and resume editing. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 00:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)


You're block has been extended to 6 months for personal attacks, vandalism, racism, and threats even after being blocked. Any further repetition of this behavior may result in your block being extended even further. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 01:15, 23 September 2005 (UTC)


One year. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 20:34, 23 September 2005 (UTC)