User talk:70.227.30.96

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] December 2007

Your recent edit to User:TheHoosierState89 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users. Thank you. Lradrama 18:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Indianapolis, Indiana

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Indianapolis, Indiana, you will be blocked from editing. Antonio Lopez (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Indianapolis

Read his reply to my message on hsi talkpage. And please stop this edit war, before both of you are blocked. Lradrama 18:49, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

It's too late I'm afraid, they have both been blocked for edit-warring.
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Welcome

Hey you should be careful next time about edit wars. If some edits are reverted. respond to the article's talk page to why your edits were changed and why your edits are important. also I recommend you to get an account and be part of Wikipedia. --Antonio Lopez (talk) 19:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Your church's festival is not notable nor necessary. There are probably hundreds of festivals in Indy and this one is not any more important than most others. The main reason it has been reverted is that it is an advertisement. To learn more, see our website. Wikipedia is WP:NOT the place to advertise this, which you are obviously doing. When your block expires, do not add this back to Indianapolis, Indiana or you will be blocked for a longer amount of time. Reywas92Talk 00:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)