User talk:70.185.113.212

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to George Voinovich appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Warner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] WP:OR

Your edits to Iron Law of Oligarchy were reverted. Please don't add unreferenced information to Wikipedia. Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 14:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

It's not...some just can't handle the Wikitruth...--70.185.113.212 (talk) 15:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't see any references. Ergo, it is unreferenced WP:OR. Please observe our policies (WP:V). Wikitruth is certainly not reliable, but I am sure they would welcome such unreferenced criticism.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia's policies are flawed. You, yourself, have just violated the spirit, if not the letter, of the dread 3RR. You are also violating the sprit of WP:OWN since you do not own that article..nor does anyone here. As far as reliability goes,the TRuth has a much better record of getting it right on the subjects it knows about than WP. A few great editors such as yourself not withstanding, WP is 95% regurgiated, cut and pasted, pastuerized crap. And a clear example of the Iron Law in action.--70.185.113.212 (talk) 17:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Please don't re-revert without discussion. As you presumably know, continued reversion is not tolerated and will eventually result in administrative measures. Your addition to that article is not in line with Wikipedia's content guidelines. You may wish to take your complaints elsewhere. Kosebamse (talk) 10:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
I am attempting to discuss, but you are not discussing. All you are doing is dictating policies, or rather your interpretaions of them, to me and then threatening to use your sysop tools against me if I do not comply. Which amouts to using your tools as weapons in an edit war to support your own opinions...not facts...I'm sure there is a policy against this somewhere, but I doubt you will be called out for it in this case...afterall you are an admin and I'm just an IPeon; a 3rd class citizen at best.. This only further serves to show just how apt an example of the Iron Law Wikipedia has become.--70.185.113.212 (talk) 12:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)