User talk:69.87.183.178
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, 69.87.183.178, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- febtalk 20:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
He also violated the rule. 69.87.183.178
- No. I reverted three times. To break 3RR, you have to revert more than three times. You reverted six times. Clayboy 20:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Collective reverting with another user for the same goal constitutes the same crime. 69.87.183.178 20:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
"You reverted six times."
Within a 48-hr period.
-
- Regardless of whether he did or not, that doesn't make it ok for you. Just because your rival killed 3 people to win a contest against you, does that make it ok for you to? An eye for an eye makes wikipedia an edit war battlefield. Please control your editing in the future -- febtalk 20:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Also, please read the note above. 3RR is a guideline not a rule. You can be banned for less or allowed more, considering circumstances involved. -- febtalk 20:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you helping me successfully block the entire static IP for a major university. That is what I wanted.
Meanwhile a self-admitted pedophile going by the handle "[Personnal Attack Removed by -- lucasbfr talk]" edits wikipedia instead and slants articles to his hearts desires. Talk about Platonic love!
Please read WP:NPA. I'd advise that you take this time while you're banned to read through Wikipedia's various policies and procedures (such as through the links given on this page). In addition, users from the university are still free to log in to their accounts to edit wikipedia, and it's unlikely that a major university's IPs wouldn't have already been warned for vandalism. -- febtalk 21:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Talk pages
Talk pages are not a place for content dispute tags such as NPOV and dispute. In addition, comments on talk pages do not require factual references, unless they are to be added to an article. Continuing to mark your page such as this makes it harder for people who truly wish to remove these problems from articles. -- febtalk 21:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] stop now
You are disturbing Wikipedia. Consider it your last warning. -- lucasbfr talk 21:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block
[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on January 21, 2007 to Pederasty
| | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |

