User talk:69.67.186.126

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Petroleum. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Mwanner | Talk 20:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 16:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Reading University Students' Union, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 16:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Reading University Students' Union

Your recent edit to Reading University Students' Union (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 16:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:Spyco. It may be seen as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please visit the sandbox. Tonywalton  | Talk 00:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Spyco, you will be blocked. -Mschel 20:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The White Stripes, you will be blocked from editing. WATP  (talk) • (contribs) 19:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The White Stripes, you will be blocked from editing. WATP  (talk) • (contribs) 19:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Great Expectations, you will be blocked from editing. Wombatcat 20:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Great Expectations, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Funpika 20:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Waggers 20:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Waggers 20:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Hot Hot Heat. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 16:45, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Bloc Québécois, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Bloc Québécois was changed by 69.67.186.126 (c) (t) replacing content with 'poop' on 2007-09-20T17:56:06+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 21:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Bloc Québécois, you will be blocked from editing. --Rrburke(talk) 21:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hot Hot Heat, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 16:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Template:Susbt:test5 utcursch | talk 16:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Inuit, you will be blocked from editing. Hiddenfromview 19:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Horn (anatomy), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Horn (anatomy) was changed by 69.67.186.126 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-12-20T18:47:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to John Gould (columnist), you will be blocked from editing. Harland1 (t/c) 18:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Government of Canada. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Taroaldo (talk) 21:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Twilight (novel). If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Andrea (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Arthur Schopenhauer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. — iridescent 21:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)