User talk:69.36.50.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

[edit] October 2007

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, your recent edits to Dan Rather have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gamaliel (Angry Mastodon! Run!) 16:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
  2. This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    The next time you add defamatory content, as you did to Chupacabra, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
  1. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Abduction phenomenon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MER-C 12:29, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, please ignore this warning.
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Extraterrestrial life‎, you will be blocked from editing. Lisatwo 22:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  3. This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:George Washington, you will be blocked from editing. John Carter 17:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  4. Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Extraterrestrial life. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. --Darkwind (talk) 19:59, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  5. This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Arturo Prat, you will be blocked from editing. Lisatwo 01:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. utcursch | talk 13:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wii Remote, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Thingg⊕⊗ 19:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hooligan firms has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 06:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of hooligan firms constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 06:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC))

[edit] List of hooligan firms

Thank you for your message. Wikipedia guidelines and policy is about verifiability and not truth. The reason the QPR firm has kept getting removed is very simple. The source being used (a Birmingham newspaper article if I recall correctly) to verify the firms name does not actually mention the name of the firm. For months I and other users have been pointing this out to what appears to be one user using multiple accounts and who has constantly ignored all the advice and help offered to them. I have repeatedly said all that is required is a fully verifiable third party source that actually gives the firm name in full. And that is it. If that had been done when all this started, which was quite some time ago, then none of this would have happened. It is not about questioning the firms existence at all, it is about verifying the firms name so that they can be included in the article. I have asked repeatedly for a source to be added that actually names the firm by name, but have been constantly ignored. Have a read of these, WP:VER, WP:RS and WP:CITE. Thank you.

[edit] May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Troy. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 13:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Daniel Payne, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Daniel Payne was changed by 69.36.50.2 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-20T16:30:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Daniel Payne constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. ——Ryan | t • c 16:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)