User talk:69.253.39.132

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed concern that this IP address has been used by Geegeethornton.
Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

Give me a good reason why you gave me a vandal warning for Corcoran.Because I'm not the Vandal if you are the one who keeps reverting it back YOU ARE THE VANDAL.

Regards Odran Corcoran 08:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Penn, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - Rklawton 16:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Abusive sockpuppeteering, Geegeethornton

  • Decline reason:

I agree, contribs show sockpuppetry. — Sandstein 19:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Abusive sockpuppeteering, Geegeethornton

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- - auburnpilot talk 22:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

I think there is a mistake.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "not aware of any geegeethorton or user by that name"

Decline reason: "We have no evidence to show that it is not the case.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 08:55, 5 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Contents

[edit] Barbara Corcoran

Please stop adding the same stuff to Corcoran, like "Barbara Corcoran", after it has been removed. It was removed because, while she may be a real estate broker, etc, she is not notable enough for inclusion in wikipedia as evidenced by repeated speedy deletions of an article on her. If you desperately want Barbara Corcoran included, you will need to write an article with outside sources that show why she is notable. You have been blocked a number of times for messing with this article, so I suggest that you don't start up again. --Chuck Sirloin 13:49, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Eighth Grade

No, actually, where I come from, we don't graduate from eighth grade, we just moved on the next grade at the end of the year. Thank you for your interest in my education though! I appreciate it! --Chuck Sirloin 23:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Corcoran (surname)

Stop removing sourced material from articles. --Chuck Sirloin 13:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Rklawton may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - Alison ☺ 04:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop editing other users' user talk pages and user pages. --Kukini hablame aqui 17:03, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  1. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Kukini hablame aqui 17:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Penn

Please see Talk:Penn and we can discuss this instead engaging in a revert war. Cornell Rockey 18:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Please disucss your edits on Talk:Penn before making changes. Cornell Rockey 20:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Penn. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Cornell Rockey 15:18, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Penn, you will be blocked from editing. Cornell Rockey 02:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] please stop deleting without discussing on Talk:Penn

This is your last warning.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Penn, you will be blocked from editing. Cornell Rockey 17:19, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] continued deletion from Penn

PLEASE discuss changes on Talk:Penn before unilaterally deleting things from the article

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Penn, you will be blocked from editing. cOrneLlrOckEy 01:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)