User talk:69.154.76.219

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please don't readd comments that a user has removed from their own talkpage. Users are aloud to remove comments from their own talkpage, see WP:TALK#User talk pages and WP:DRC. Thanks! Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 21:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for 3RR violations and repeatedly blanking large amount of cited text that you personally disagree with, without seeking or achieving consensus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "The logs show that I only reverted the article twice within the 24 hour period."

Decline reason: "This does not address the reason for your block, which is that you violated WP:3RR. — Yamla 20:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


{{unblock|The logs show that I only reverted the article twice within the 24 hour period.}}

Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

User did not violate 3RR and the blocking user was involved in the reverting with the user.

Request handled by: Metros 02:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Don Richardson (missionary). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.

Your unblock was technically correct, but you were lucky all the same to find such a kindly and forgiving admin as Metros. Please be aware that 3 reverts are not an entitlement, and that any future edit-warring may attract another block. Don't do it; there are always better ways to improve an article. --John 04:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)