From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Warning
Please refrain from further reverts, as you are in violation of Wikipedia:3RR. Further reverts will get you blocked. ForeignerFromTheEast 23:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Three revert rule block
Sam Blacketer 10:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Radoviš, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Captain panda 03:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. . ForeignerFromTheEast 03:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Disruptive reverting
Your reverting to assert a nationalistic point of view is disruptive. Please stop immediately, or you will be blocked from editing. Sam Blacketer 22:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been
blocked from editing for a period of
1 week in accordance with
Wikipedia's blocking policy for
continued reverting and nationalistic point of view editing on Radoviš. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may
contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|
your reason here}} below.
Sam Blacketer 08:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I request that another editor reviews my edits on the 'Radovis' page, preferably someone who is not a nationalistic narrow-minded individual with objective knowledge of the Balkan Peninsula (hopefully with some background in Slavic history)."
Decline reason: "Clear edit warring. Additionally, removing an informative link to another article is blatant vandalism. Block is valid. — Yamla 21:23, 19 October 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "I have as much right to edit my country's pages on Wikipedia as anyone. I request that another editor reviews my request. Whenever I gave a reason, the counter-reason was always "vandalism" which is always the simplest thing to say (knowing that it would work to have me blocked - which it obviouly did). But I guess simple minds giv give simple reasons AND accept simple words. I need a more thorough review of the history behind my request."
Decline reason: "This is not about your "rights" — no one has the right to edit disruptively on any page, regardless if its your country, or an article about mittens. You clearly have been edit warring, and edit warring is disruptive. You not only show no understanding that your edits were disruptive, but you clearly also appear ready and willing to continue them if unblocked. The accusations of bad faith of the part of the previous reviewing admin are also in very poor taste. — Haemo 01:14, 20 October 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.
Request reason: "Yes, I see... Nice to see you here "Haemo". It's all clear to me NOW! Cheers! Thanks for the personal attack. I appreciate it. It's only sad that it had to be on Wikipedia."
Decline reason: "Talk page protected against further contravening of WP:CIVIL and abuse of the unblock template. --Kinu t/c 04:24, 20 October 2007 (UTC)"
Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.
 | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address.
[WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]
|
