User talk:69.107.3.47

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please source your controversial statement before inserting it back into the article A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Netkinetic (t/c/@) 20:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: My Edit

The statement that currently exists is presented as fact by the author. It has always been in dispute and that's what I was referencing. However, I'm waaaaaaaay too tired and disinterested in rounding up the membership and then sourcing the refutation. Let him have the historical conceit. Those of us who were there will continue to question the veracity. This is a bird's eye view about how history is created, out of half and untruths and exaggerations. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.107.3.47 (talk • contribs) 07 08 2006.

Well the next time you'd care to sign your name and actually refer by name to the article in question, you may receive a response. Since you haven't developed such an advanced skillset as yet, I'll let you stew in your own juices.Netkinetic (t/c/@) 23:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)