User talk:68.76.36.122

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I find it very annoying that you continue to remove relevant information from the CC information page. Like it or not,a person's personal life is part of who they are and removing it from this site repeatedly will not make it or me go away. I will continue to re-instate that information every single day. It is relevant.It is factual and if need be, I will post all of the documentation I already have scanned in and loaded on-line and submit it to this article and report you for tampering if the relationship section is removed again.

The documents I am ready to post are as follows from Ohio state records department as well as OSU student records.

1.)Certificate of marriage to J.B and certificate of birth of his first son. 2.)Certificate of Divorce as filed by JB 5 years later and all court records which name CC as an "Adulter" who got his student (his current wife SE) pregnant.(I have these records saved and ready to go) 3.)Hospital records of your birth (or wifes..)which coincide with said affair. 4.)Student records of SE while CC was a teacher 5.)marriage record to SE

Like I said, I have all of the fact's that Wiki needs in order to publish these FACTS. I will provide links for the public to view as well and you will from what I understand be banned from this site and any further edits.so you make the call.

To "Csuri": As you will see from your recent visits to the csuri article, your contributions have been deleted by wiki editors as unsubstantiated. Also, I note you have received many warnings for your tampering of this article.
- have a good day


  1. Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits , as you are doing in Charles Csuri. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. cgilbert 19:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)